<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Femtocell: free-riding, fair play or a fixer-upper?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shefaly-yogendra.com/blog/2010/01/18/femtocell-free-riding-fair-play-or-a-fixer-upper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shefaly-yogendra.com/blog/2010/01/18/femtocell-free-riding-fair-play-or-a-fixer-upper/</link>
	<description>Strategy at the cusp of technology, investment and regulation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:24:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Femtocell market update for week of 18 Jan 2010 &#171; 3G In The Home</title>
		<link>http://shefaly-yogendra.com/blog/2010/01/18/femtocell-free-riding-fair-play-or-a-fixer-upper/comment-page-1/#comment-1374</link>
		<dc:creator>Femtocell market update for week of 18 Jan 2010 &#171; 3G In The Home</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 01:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shefaly-yogendra.com/?p=1183#comment-1374</guid>
		<description>[...] believing that Wi-Fi is the answer instead (perhaps they should read the white paper), and Shefaly Yogendra says mobile data traffic should be free, given that the Sure Signal is using the customer’s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] believing that Wi-Fi is the answer instead (perhaps they should read the white paper), and Shefaly Yogendra says mobile data traffic should be free, given that the Sure Signal is using the customer’s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nita</title>
		<link>http://shefaly-yogendra.com/blog/2010/01/18/femtocell-free-riding-fair-play-or-a-fixer-upper/comment-page-1/#comment-1330</link>
		<dc:creator>Nita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 02:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shefaly-yogendra.com/?p=1183#comment-1330</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know why but I always think of the healh aspect. Living near a mobile phone tower has its disadvantages, but then I guess in developed countries they don&#039;t have them in densely populated residential areas. In India we do. Different service providers have different areas where they are stronger. To reduce the health burden I think service providers should pool in  money and build infrastructure that they can share. Perhaps this idea does not make business sense.

&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;@Nita&lt;/strong&gt;: Thanks for your note. First thing: radiation. Karolinska Institute has done extensive research on the link between mobile phones and radiation exposure. The evidence so far is inconclusive. Further on radiation, in the grand schema of all the radiation we are already subjected to, mobile towers and phones are probably minuscule. Our food and water, our use of computers/ TVs/ smoke alarms, several medical procedures all contribute to our radiation dose. Second: shared infrastructure. Interestingly that is where I believe the MNOs may be headed. If you like, listen to &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_8460000/8460579.stm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Peter Cochrane on this clip&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know why but I always think of the healh aspect. Living near a mobile phone tower has its disadvantages, but then I guess in developed countries they don&#8217;t have them in densely populated residential areas. In India we do. Different service providers have different areas where they are stronger. To reduce the health burden I think service providers should pool in  money and build infrastructure that they can share. Perhaps this idea does not make business sense.</p>
<p><em><strong>@Nita</strong>: Thanks for your note. First thing: radiation. Karolinska Institute has done extensive research on the link between mobile phones and radiation exposure. The evidence so far is inconclusive. Further on radiation, in the grand schema of all the radiation we are already subjected to, mobile towers and phones are probably minuscule. Our food and water, our use of computers/ TVs/ smoke alarms, several medical procedures all contribute to our radiation dose. Second: shared infrastructure. Interestingly that is where I believe the MNOs may be headed. If you like, listen to <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_8460000/8460579.stm" rel="nofollow">Peter Cochrane on this clip</a>. </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Femtocell: free-riding, fair play or a fixer-upper? -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://shefaly-yogendra.com/blog/2010/01/18/femtocell-free-riding-fair-play-or-a-fixer-upper/comment-page-1/#comment-1203</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Femtocell: free-riding, fair play or a fixer-upper? -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 17:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shefaly-yogendra.com/?p=1183#comment-1203</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Shefaly and Shefaly, Paul Richardson. Paul Richardson said: While we wait for mobile phone networks to plug gaps in BB access, BB can plug the gaps in mobile phone coverage. http://bit.ly/8MTdWU [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Shefaly and Shefaly, Paul Richardson. Paul Richardson said: While we wait for mobile phone networks to plug gaps in BB access, BB can plug the gaps in mobile phone coverage. <a href="http://bit.ly/8MTdWU" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/8MTdWU</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://shefaly-yogendra.com/blog/2010/01/18/femtocell-free-riding-fair-play-or-a-fixer-upper/comment-page-1/#comment-1197</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shefaly-yogendra.com/?p=1183#comment-1197</guid>
		<description>Shefaly if you were to try and surf on your Nokia using wifi you&#039;d discover that they battery work burn out faster than a failed X Factor audition!  The joy of a femtocell is that the handset battery is not effected by poor in building coverage.

When it comes to 3G in the emerging markets the issue is a lack of backhaul infrastructure that limits the ability to build out base stations.  In some areas the Government has mandated that networks share radio access networks in an effort to manage capacity.  Others are looking at solutions that do not require national coverage in an effort to increase data networks using mobile standards.  The arrival of LTE might offer a solution and if spectrum is re-farmed then you could see data networks making it  to rural areas.

The issue of radio coverage is difficult and the use of all you can eat pricing makes it difficult to get a return on the investment.  When planning for 3G, models did not see the network being used for data services but rather location based entertainment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shefaly if you were to try and surf on your Nokia using wifi you&#8217;d discover that they battery work burn out faster than a failed X Factor audition!  The joy of a femtocell is that the handset battery is not effected by poor in building coverage.</p>
<p>When it comes to 3G in the emerging markets the issue is a lack of backhaul infrastructure that limits the ability to build out base stations.  In some areas the Government has mandated that networks share radio access networks in an effort to manage capacity.  Others are looking at solutions that do not require national coverage in an effort to increase data networks using mobile standards.  The arrival of LTE might offer a solution and if spectrum is re-farmed then you could see data networks making it  to rural areas.</p>
<p>The issue of radio coverage is difficult and the use of all you can eat pricing makes it difficult to get a return on the investment.  When planning for 3G, models did not see the network being used for data services but rather location based entertainment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
