Shefaly Yogendra

(This post is for all those Indian women with whom I have had conversations on the issue for months. I couldn’t seethe any more. But the sexual harassment issue won’t just go away without persistent action. Will now be a good time?)

Indian women professionals – and may their tribe increase! – are in an interesting place. They are making strides in the workplace, with better education, better prospects and growing income and hence financial independence.

Yet they still are in the minority in the workplace as the WEF’s Corporate Gender Gap report shows. With just 23% women employees, India lags behind Japan (24%), Turkey (26%) and Austria (29%), while the USA (52%), Spain (48%), Canada (46%) and Finland (44%)  are way ahead. Services sectors employ women in larger numbers, according to the report: financial services and insurance (60%), professional services (56%), media and entertainment (42%). Smaller numbers are employed in automotive (18%), mining (18%) and agriculture (21%) sectors although over 90% of women in India work in the unorganised sectors so I am not sure at least about the agriculture numbers.

As anecdotal evidence goes, white-collar sexual harassment is rampant in India. And growing. The continued minority status of women in the workplace is not the causal explanation, but it is an important factor to bear in mind.

Women have taken well to their hard-earned freedoms, but most men seem to be unable to deal with it. If at all, Indian men by and large remain “selectively modern”. This places a great burden on the professional woman. For she risks being seen as “easy” and “available” just because she dares leave her home to go to work.

The harassment seems to be everywhere, takes many forms, and occurs in any and every possible work situation. Among experiences I have been told are:

* Young women in a recruitment process finding themselves invited for an informal coffee meeting, where suggestions about going to a film together (seriously!) or for drinks (this is never as simple as it is in the UK, for instance) are made by the hiring manager;

* Young women being asked by married male bosses to accompany them on official trips where, freed from the norms of the office, the bosses make sexual advances and often maul or grope the women;

* Insubordination by male staff, many openly belligerent towards a woman manager; and then the woman manager’s disapproval leading to loud discussions about “that time of the month” and making of lewd signs and comments in her presence.

And these are just some blue-chip multinational firms operating in India!

My reaction to hearing these things was: why don’t you challenge or report this behaviour? That is a whole other kettle of fish. There are several reasons why women do not challenge or report such stuff.

First comes, the innate fear of being sacked, or worse, being blamed as the party that misled an innocent man, and the worst, being labelled as a whore, through no fault of her own. So lets understand this. The women is harassed but if she confronts the harasser/groper/ molester/ abuser, she may find her job is lost. The benefit of doubt is always given to the man. Let’s imagine, for discussion sake, that the man is out of the job, the woman still won’t be out of the woods. We Indians are a gossipy lot, and nobody likes to find that conversation suddenly stops when she enters a room.

Then in firms, there is lack of due process. Even when the process exists, management commitment is half-hearted or absent. In one such instance, that I heard of, I asked about the process. The woman told me that a process existed but it required her to prove that she was harassed. Exactly how she would do this was unclear and the HR manager was unable or unwilling to advise. Her manager was sympathetic but advised her against “making trouble” which is another way of creating a FUD in the woman’s mind. The whole thing reminded me of Penelope Trunk’s advice that in most cases, women must not report sexual harassment. Her argument only outlines the pathetic circumstances in which professional women work.

My natural curiosity is about why decent men, of whom India has plenty too, do not speak up. Conversations with the good men I know suggest a host of reasons.

They do not want to become a butt of jokes, or otherwise be aimlessly “linked” with the woman they are trying to defend. “Abey, teri behen lagti hai kya?” (Hindi tr. Is she your sister?) seems to be a standard taunt.

They risk falling out of the informal boys’ club that their workplace is. This is important because often they may not know who amongst the coterie is a lascivious bastard waiting for an opportunity. Sorry I do not know how else to describe men who think it is ok to harass or maul their female colleagues!

They do their bit silently. By removing female colleagues from situations where harassment may be imminent. By modifying circumstances within their power so that women are not in an awkward situation, This sort of stuff, while chivalrous and well-intentioned, is a Band-Aid (TM) solution when a bypass is required!

So, is India bound to be branded and remain a nation of frustrated male sexual harassers? A nation where sexual harassment and molestation will forever be euphemised as “eve-teasing”? A country where women, regardless of colour, age, marital status, whatever have no safety on the streets, nor any safety in their workplace?

How – in the absence of due process and in the presence of under-committed leadership in workplaces – can one report, expose, punish the harassers hiding behind their tailored suits and high-minded corporate titles?

When will it stop?

Questions, questions, questions. Do you have any answers? Whether you are a person who may have been sexually harassed; or a person who has watched silently and seethed while someone you know was sexually harassed or harassing; or indeed, a person who may have sexually harassed someone and have hopefully seen the error of his ways?

Isn’t it time we spoke up and did something real and meaningful to ensure that the shame that is visited by the society upon the woman is instead visited upon her harasser?

{ 5 comments }

There was a turning point sometime in the last 15 years. I can’t be sure exactly when I started physically wincing, when faced with expressions of casual racism. The kind that shows up in one or the other unguarded comment, but increasingly made quite permanent in the age of social media and networks.

This sort of stuff wasn’t new to me. As a North Indian, I had heard my compatriots refer to South Indians as “Madrasi”, never mind whether they were from Madras on not. There are also various shorthand descriptions for Maharashtrians, Gujaratis, UP/ Bihar residents, Keralites among others. Of course, the rest of India reserves a special brand of derision for those from our North-Eastern states, suggesting to their faces that they don’t “look Indian”, whatever the hell that means.

Having lived a fair bit of my life in India, I should have been inured but I never did like this reductive shorthand. I have lived in various parts of India and accordingly have faced several assumptions and been asked an unfair share of weird questions including “are you Anglo-Indian?”, a reference to my coloured eyes.

So what changed? Was it when I was a new immigrant in England, curiously watching a football game between an EPL team and Galatasaray, a Turkish team, where the English fans were chanting “I’d rather be a Paki than a Turk”? Or was it, once again the late 1990s, when I saw an Indian family standing in Trafalgar Square, pointing to a black man saying “dekho, negro jaa raha hai!“? (tr. Look, there goes a Negro). Or was it when an otherwise decent and well-read friend continually referred to the Japanese as “Japs”, even as I died a little bit inside every time he did it?

I can’t remember clearly when it was that I started interrupting people to say “that is racist”. I do remember accosting that Indian family and telling them in chaste Hindi not to say stuff like that aloud, if they did not fancy being lynched or at least told off. Recently, when I came across a tweet that said: “a cute chink from antwerp next to me!! Good flight to me!“ I tweeted that was the reason why Indians complaining about racism disturbs me. Then I came across another reference to a “chinky model on an Amir Khan ad” on Twitter, which the person first defended as “irreverent spirit” then deleted altogether. Lest you should think I only seem to notice faux-pas committed by Indians,  here is a recent tweet saying “It’s fancy dress today; (name of child redacted) as a Red Indian” by a British colleague of mine, who I know knows better. I have of course lost track of how many of my brown – and white! – friends casually refer to “white trash“, dismissing a whole range of people with one unfair slur.

This is peculiar and endemic problem. In a diverse society, everything is bound to offend somebody. The use of the term “nitty gritty” has been deemed racist in the past. There is a whole range of words in our day-to-day language that are offensive to a whole range of people for historical reasons. Here is a link that tells us why hooligan, vandal, hip hip hooray, barbarian, bugger, gyp, and picnic are all racist. Yes, picnic. If that is not enough, there is a whole page on Wikipedia on ethnic slurs.

So where do we stop? Why stop? Because I am tired. I hope so are you. I am tired of this competitive offence-taking. It is a race to the bottom. I am tired of having to keep up with not just the etymology, but also the historical evolution of a word, every word till it became unusable in civilised company. I am tired of having to watch – almost focus on – the many ways a person differs from me so that I don’t accidentally say something stupid or hurtful. I am also tired of constantly correcting my friends for fear that if they didn’t give up their casual racist references, some day they will receive more than an interjection in words.

Every day I open my eyes, the dictionary of words we can all use in mixed race or mixed ethnicity company shrinks just that little bit more. Every day I talk to someone, I am wary of a hundred ways in which they can be offended by something I said. Every day I am aware that this damages our ability to bond just that little bit more, as we all progress to bowling alone.

Yes, I know there is evidence that harsh and malicious words heard every day, social rejection faced every day increase our risk of inflammation related disease, including arthritis. I am not advocating we use harsh words towards each other. Harsh goes beyond racist and ethnic slurs, and you know that as well as I do.

What I am arguing for is this:

Let’s reclaim the language we speak, all the words that have been imbued with negativity by social and historical context, all the words that are now serving to make it impossible for human beings to communicate without fear of giving or taking offence.

I am not naïve enough to believe that someone if we stop imbuing words with negativity or offensiveness, racism and apartheid, in the literal sense of the word, will somehow go away. I am also not blind to the good things that can happen when diverse viewpoints get together and create new ideas. But there is a point where separateness, difference and apartheid are destructive of social fabric and trust. We are at that point now. As the means of engagement grow, we engage with more and more people. We need more trust, not less. We need points in common, not points of difference. If we are not in fear of giving or taking offence, we can start chipping away at the foundations of avoidable, pointless, empty separateness. And hopefully make greater progress towards reaping the benefits of diversity of ideas.

Related old posts (unmissable discussion in comments in all posts, to the credit of my readers):

Citizenship and Apartheid: the role of language

Thoughts on “otherness”

On racism, political correctness and misogyny

{ 8 comments }

Qu’elles portent de la voilette*…

July 19, 2010

It is open season on veils, if you will pardon the oxymoron. The French parliament has voted to ban the Islamic veil in public. So much for liberté, never mind égalité or fraternité. A British Tory MP has said he will not meet constituents who wear veils. So much for being an elected representative of [...]

Read the full article →

Keep your eyes on ..

July 7, 2010

No, this is not a reference to the Doors song that begins similarly. But it is a reference to what I am talking about in this post. So do read on. This article in the New York Times has created much conversation on a friend’s Facebook wall. The main idea is that the age old [...]

Read the full article →

Pointless pursuits: Lugging books around

June 29, 2010

Time to head out the door. Notebook (a hard bound Magneto)? Check. Diary (a smaller hard bound Magneto)? Check. Fountain pen? Check. Wallet? Check. Phone? Check. Keys? Check. Book? Um… what shall I take today? This is my struggle every day I head out. To a meeting, a lunch, a film, sometimes even my Pilates [...]

Read the full article →

Indian census, caste and hand-wringing

May 16, 2010

“Caste”. A term that baffles many westerners in their attempts at understanding India’s complex social fabric. In India too, people do not really know much about the complicated, multi-layered, politically charged caste system. Except perhaps their own little microcosm of it. Indian politicians however are the masters of divide-and-rule to the extent that would put [...]

Read the full article →

Fair is lovely, or is it?

March 23, 2010

Another day, another article in the press about India’s obsession with fair or white skin. The Indian market for fairness creams is apparently growing at 18% per annum. The colour of vanity is not really unique, as I have written before. After Coco Chanel popularised tanning in the 1920s, a tanned skin is seen amongst [...]

Read the full article →

Adults who slap and beat others, or why abuse of power imbalance must be challenged…

February 4, 2010

Some of us remember the uproar in the media about the beating one of the Slumdog Millionaire child stars received from his father. And then it all went quiet. Children and servants in India are often at the receiving end of physical violence, in the form of slapping or beating, from adults who hold power [...]

Read the full article →

A Hindu Education aka A Study in Secular Exasperation

January 29, 2010

It is apparently a first in the UK. Krishna-Avanti Primary School that recently opened in Edgware, North London, is the first school to promise its pupils that they will receive a Hindu Education. (Ed. The description “Hindu Education” was used to describe the school’s offering in the 8am news bulletin on BBC Radio 4, on January [...]

Read the full article →

Scoop on iPad, aka iSay

January 27, 2010

All that hoopla over the last few days and what does Apple launch? A tablet device unimaginatively called iPad. The unfortunate associations surfaced immediately as was evident from iTampon trending on Twitter within minutes of the announcement. Dear readers, seeing the enthusiasm, I have decided not to conceal the secrets of future versions any more. Here [...]

Read the full article →