Four For Friday (7)

This occasional series of good readings from around the web appears when the week’s readings have been thought-provoking. The themes are strategy, technology, investment and regulation, but sometimes they just cannot be separated.

Adrian Chan (@gravity7) shared this article from 2006: differentiating risk aversion from betrayal aversion using game theory.

Sustainable Innovation is tricky. Always provocative, Alan mentions MIT-Sloan’s research and discusses why just reducing the cost of technology does not help innovation.

Chris Yeh explains why founders reap (seemingly) disproportionate rewards.

In policy-making, the intent matters but the outcomes, including unseen outcomes matter more. Ruth Levine asks if the US will have better global health policies but get worse results.

One thought on “Four For Friday (7)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s