“My Spotify drains my phone battery”, she said.
“Do you listen to it on streaming or offline?”, I asked.
“Why, yes I do listen to it on streaming!”
“So you see both the 3G access you are using and the app itself use battery. You can see battery use by app and make choices accordingly especially when you are outside and worried you couldn’t recharge your phone.”
“How do I do that?”, she immediately wanted to know.
Cue, search through settings and battery use data on her 4 year old Samsung Android phone.
“The guys at the Samsung store didn’t help me”, she lamented.
So we opened the settings to check battery use and she was horrified.
“Where did all these apps come from? I am not using them”, she said.
“Not right now, perhaps, but they may be running in the background or operating on a pull mechanism”, I said, weakly. And clearly, unhelpfully.
We then discussed what “pull” means, what other common uses may be battery-draining, how it may be necessary to behave differently to conserve battery, how some apps more than others drain battery, and other things she now needs to know, just so she can use the technology she deems essential to her work and her outside-work life.
There were several such moments, as I helped this 65 year old friend of mine. She needs to get to grips with some essential technology tools and social media as she works on taking her business global.
The detail about her age and her business are material here lest the rest of this reflection should get drowned in the assumptions that just because she is older, she is not “smart enough” or “compos mentis”.
She isn’t the first among my over-55 friends whom I have recently helped with their technology and social media needs. Phones and social networks all play a key role.
It is soon clear that much of the technology design has forgotten technology also serves our ageing population at hand.
IMF depiction of our ageing populations
Mobile phones have several non-obvious hidden access features, sometimes resistive touch screens, complicated pathways to switching off default settings on various apps and in case of Android phones, a fragmented ecosystem that confuses older users who did not cut their teeth on technology.
Social networks have arcane and complex privacy settings, light coloured buttons, light grey ellipses to access extra features, drop-down menus hidden behind little arrows, and of course, their own lingo for features.
It may even seem the ageing user is misbehaving i.e. not behaving in accordance with the designers’ expectations of their ability to make use of features they should be able to see (never mind almost universally weakening eye sight with age) or discover. Because, hey, it is so intuitive, you know!
What is wrong with this picture?
Is technology meant to exist for its own sake? Or is it meant to serve someone?
What are the design assumptions at work here? Do we care whom we are including — and whom we are excluding — by our design choices?
Can the growing numbers of ageing people be this invisible?
Post script
As she started to gather her things and prepare to leave, I said, trying to be helpful, “Of course, you could just buy a portable battery pack so you are never out of battery when you leave home.”
She put her things down and looked at me sternly, “That is now for another day, Shefaly. I cannot cope with this any more.”
Related reading:
Why I think “digital native” and “digital immigrant” typology is short-sighted and unhelpful